|
|
|
The Formation of the Modern East Asian Economy
Second, there are the archaeological
findings. While this approach is not possible in China
since archaeology there is only done on the periods before
1000 AD, elsewhere in Asia the results have been little
short of startling. Archaeological excavations in southeast
Asia have uncovered a great amount of Chinese ceramic
from the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. In Japan also,
such diggings have shown a dense distribution of fifteenth
century Chinese goods, especially ceramics, all along
the coastal areas of western Japan, from Kyushu up through
the Inland Sea. The amount so far discovered is already
far beyond what one might have expected from the official
trade between the countries, particularly in these provincial
sites during two centuries of a supposed ban on private
trade. But one is still not prepared for the results of
a recent excavation in southern Hokkaido, a place one
might suppose was far off the beaten track of any merchant.
At the Japanese colony town of Katsuyama-tate, which served
as the center of Japanese-Ainu trade along the Japan Sea
from 1473 to 1514, over 10,000 objects have been dug up.
More than 60% of them were imported Chinese ceramics,
blue and white, white, and celadon. Here and elsewhere
the excavated Chinese ceramics were not luxury items but
objects for daily use.
Thirdly, the non-Chinese
side was far less anxious to curtail the China trade than
was the Ming court. The Ming ban on private trade in China's
coastal ports only meant the development instead of several
southeast Asian ports for transshipment-Ayutthaya, Melaka,
Macau, Amoy, Taoyuan, Batavia, Manila, and Naha in the
Ryukyus. All the evidence recently collected by Anthony
Read (* earlier spelled as Reid) suggests these and other
ports continued to engage in Chinese trade during the
fifteenth century, the period when the ban was meant to
be most effective. The state of Java was so keen to trade
with China even within the framework of tribute trade
that in 1443 and 1453, the Ming government demanded that
the Javanese send tribute less often. Siam and Melaka
proved even more eager, and by the 1470s they became more
important than Java as China's trading partners. Melaka
in particular placed emphasis on this link by (*)
And finally, the ban on
Chinese merchants doing private trade with foreigners
in Chinese ports did not prevent Chinese merchants from
working for foreigners. In an early form of the later
compradore system of nineteenth and twentieth century
China, Chinese merchants worked in the employ of foreign
states anxious to maintain good ties with the Chinese
court and other Chinese merchants in China. Some of these
overseas Chinese traders had settled abroad long before
Zheng He's voyages.
Previous |13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|Next
|
| Sponsored by the Chuan Lyu Foundation © 1997 - 2008 The Chuan Lyu Foundation All Rights Reserved | |
|