|
|
|
The problem of Industrial Pollution in Taiwan
However, as pointed out by legislator Ke Chien-ming,
this event at the Hsin-chu Science-based Industrial
Park was just a microcosm of Taiwan's industrial policy
failure. He urged that the development of high-tech
industry should also take into consideration environmental
protection, and not just for seeking profit. (Chung-shih
wan-pao, 1997/10/30/6; 1997/10/3/13; 1997/11/02/11;1997/11/07/6;
1997/11/09/4; Taiwan jih-pao, 1997/12/06/23) In July
1998 the EPA reported that improvement measures had
been taken at the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial
Park and a special group was organized to assist and
supervise wastewater control. (http://www.epa.gov.tw.news/gn870728.htm)
It
is notable that the IDB had entrusted the Industrial
Pollution Center (IPCC), established in October 1983,
to provide technical and extension services to assist
industries in improving pollution prevention and control.
So far, the IPCC has conducted detailed studies on
the situation of wastewater control in 13 industries
and the results are summarized in Table 2 to demonstrate
current situation.
Table 2 reveals some
notable facts. In terms of the amount of wastewater
produced per day, paper, dyeing and finishing, electroplate
and leather industries ranked at the top. Factories
of these four industries are mostly small- and medium-sized
with a capital below NT$60 million; the ratio of the
total cost over the volume of business is also larger
than that of large-scale industries.
As a high-tech
industry, semiconductor manufacturing produced more
than 30,000m3 (* superscript) of wastewater per day,
comparable to the amount of the leather industry;
but its ratio of cost over volume of business is much
smaller. In terms according to the Effluent Standard
set by the EPA, most factories qualified for the 1993
standard, while the opposite was true for the 1998
standard except for the power plants. It is notable
that the electroplate industry had the smallest percentage
(65 percent) of factories accorded the 1993 standard,
but it still had 60 percent hat accorded with the
1998 standard, next only to power plants (88 percent)
and motorcycle manufacturing (67 percent).
An overall view of industrial
wastewater control may be seen in the EPA statistics
as shown in Table 3. It is clear that the number of
enterprise units brought under controlled was usually
below 10,000 in the 1980s and around 15,000 in the
1990s. On average, the time of inspection per unit
was usually less than 2 per year, except for 1989-1992
when it was around 3. Figure 3 shows four curves.
The first curve is the percentage of units improved;
Previous |14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|Next
|
| Sponsored by the Chuan Lyu Foundation © 1997 - 2008 The Chuan Lyu Foundation All Rights Reserved | |
|