









|
|
|
The Formation of the Modern East Asian Economy
Chinese trade during the
eighteenth and early nineteenth century was conducted
through both the tribute trade and the junk trade. Much
past research has dealt with the former, and too little
with the latter, mainly because much of China's troubles
with the West in the nineteenth century stemmed from conflicts
over this type of tribute trade and because the institutions
engaged in this trade have left numerous records.15 The
junk trade, which sometimes accompanied this tribute trade
but often was separately carried out by Chinese merchants
themselves, has only recently begun to attract the attention
it merits.16 Its records are far fewer and more scattered.
Also, it involved nations who, instead of threatening
China, actually allowed or supported Chinese merchants
to secure an indispensable role in Asian trade under the
tribute system and eventually dominate commerce throughout
all of southeast Asia.
Thus, whereas Western traders
had regularly secured political and military support from
their governments and even Chinese peasants had often
received tax breaks from the Qing government for opening
up land on the barren plains of the northwest, the overseas
Chinese traders and the foreign success of the junk trade
usually received little but distrust from their government.17
At the court, they were widely considered little more
than pirates, smugglers, and criminals selling off the
nation's patrimony of precious metals, hardwoods, rice,
and boats. Thus, for two and a half decades, from 1661
to 1684, and from 1717 to 1727, they were banned from
going abroad, as in the Ming. And when the court eventually
tolerated the overseas trade due to repeated local insistence
on the importance of this trade for tax revenues and jobs18,
both the court and local officials conspired to channel
all this trade to its direct supervision and skim off
a fair portion of its profits for their personal use.19
Just as the Imperial Household relied increasingly on
a share of the overseas trade, so did many Manchu and
Chinese officials appointed to supervise the trade to
turn to it for their private income.20 Hence, the Qing
established only four ports that overseas boats had to
sail to and from-Canton and Amoy from 1684 and Shanghai
and Ningpo from 1685. And from 1757 it ordered that all
overseas trade be conducted at only one port, Canton.
Moreover, the Qing concocted
a labyrinth of rules for Chinese maritime trade which
would have warmed the heart of any bureaucrat. The size
of the boats and their crews, their destinations, the
amount of rice in their holds, the number of masts on
their decks, and the objects they could trade were just
a few of the matters the government felt free to regulate.
Previous |42|43|44|45|46|47|48|49|50|51|52|Next
|
| Sponsored by the Chuan Lyu Foundation © 1997 - 2008 The Chuan Lyu Foundation All Rights Reserved | |
|