









|
|
|
The Formation of the Modern East Asian Economy
Secondly,
as for the fate of the Chinese traders we have been
discussing, they similarly have little doubt: the principal
transporters, if not producers, of this foreign maritime
trade in both northeast and southeast Asia remained
Chinese merchants until the early twentieth century.
The change would come when not Western but Japanese
merchants and companies' command of industrial goods
enabled them for the first time to dominate the transport
routes and commodity markets throughout coastal East
Asia. The predominance of the West would be most evident
in the financial sphere, where it could greatly influence
both countries, even if the Japanese, unlike the Chinese,
greatly restricted the involvement of Western capital
in their domestic manufacturing. Thus, late nineteenth
century competition from within the traditional world
of intra-Asian trade would end the 900-year-long Chinese
domination of East Asian maritime trade, but even then
not completely in all areas and sectors.
Claims
for the continued strength of intra-Asian trade during
this heyday of Western imperialism may well surprise
those of us accustomed to thinking of nineteenth century
trade being transformed from restricted tribute to free
treaty port trade. Yet, as I have made clear in my earlier
lectures, private trading was widely carried out by
East and Southeast Asians among themselves within the
traditional tribute system. Not only did some East Asian
states carry out tribute relations with other states
than China, but also Japan, Korea, and Vietnam all in
their own way conceived of themselves running mini-Middle
Kingdoms in relation to other states. Thus, the Western
powers' opening of the ports, it needs to be remembered,
opened up the port for not just themselves but also
for traders from other Asian countries as well. In 1871,
China and Japan agreed to conduct free trade with one
another; in 1876, Japan and Korea reached a similar
accord, and in 1882, so did China and Korea. For example,
following the signing of the Treaty of Kanghwa in 1876,
Japanese-Korean trade increased greatly. The total value
of their trade at Pusan multiplied several fold during
the second half of the 1870s, and the imminent opening
of the port of Wonsan promised even more exchange of
goods. The opening of this and other treaty ports stimulated
intra-Asian trade, but did not necessarily represents
a totally abrupt change in the trading relations.
Sughirara has compiled
some useful statistics indicating the strength of this
intra-Asian trade. From 1883 to 1913, the average annual
rate of growth in the exports of Asia to the West (that
is, Europe and North America) was 3.2%, a figure roughly
the same as the average annual growth rate for all world
trade during these three decades.
Previous |55|56|57|58|59|60|61|62|63|64|65|Next
|
| Sponsored by the Chuan Lyu Foundation © 1997 - 2008 The Chuan Lyu Foundation All Rights Reserved | |
|